The royal family is always in the news, for one reason or another. But which one is your favorite, and why? Take the poll and share your thoughts in the comments. If you’re not a fan of any Royals, feel free to share why you don’t like them in the comments, too.
In case you missed them, I had a few thoughts to share about two royals in previous articles:
I’ve met Anne and she’s bloody hilarious, Swears like a sailor (she’s head of the Wrens) and you just know she’d get down and dirty if she went on a run ashore.
I used to be a lackadaisical royalist but no more. Lizzie presided over the destruction of my country during her reign. Charles - can't stand him. He's a WEF/globalist stooge. If I'm going to get personal - they all look inbred at this point. I voted for Anne as she's supposedly hard working and down to earth.
With the caveat that I am no royals fan, as they are just descendants of the robber barons who could hire the most mercenaries and thugs to wrest control from other robber barons and appropriate all the country's resources and wealth......with all that said, I would go for Princess Anne. She appears to be the only one of Lizzie's progeny to have shown integrity and sense of duty through her life. She does all the unglamorous public engagements and charity patron stuff with never a word of complaint or attention-seeking. The rest of them seem to be parasitic ingrates, including Charlie boy, the globalist stooge.
I think Charles never had the character for leadership. He's a spoilt brat who always whined about his duty. Lizzie knew this and hung on for as long as she could to spare the nation from her indulged, out-of-touch son. If the Brits love their First Family, let them have them. I don't get it, but I don't need to.
Have to say Anne - she's worked her butt off over the years, been done for speeding and dog biting. Showed her grit as an equestrian eating dirt in the Olympics and ditched her arranged husband for a true love. Kate's great but no more a Royal than Fergie
Once it was widely known that the Royals had no more power, why did anyone care?
To me the Royals are the predecessors to Biden. They're only there to fill a seat, while other people wield power around them. They are 100% handled.
Perhaps that's why I never cared about celebrities. It's like they are born, then handed off to a PR firm. Their mother doesn't even get to hold them first. It's all fake and synthetic -- for the sake of being fake and synthetic.
Lots of good things about him but most remarkably, as a result of his father dying during WW2 in an air crash, he's carried the same title for 81 years, 10 years longer than our late Queen was monarch. For the uninitiated, he is "Prince" as a result of being the grandchild of a King (George V), a right that continues to this day, although notably Princess Anne did not take it up for her 2 children.
Former Emperor Akihito; dude has a day job and hasn't presided over the downfall of his country and always preferred to be left alone with his kid and was begging to retire since the 90s it seems.
We should ditch the Saxe-Coburg Gotha’s and reinstitute the Plantagenet line that tragically fell at Bosworth Field when Richard III, the true King of England was killed attempting to charge the Welsh usurper, Henry Tudor.
I am generally not a fan of "royalty" in any manner, because we are all ultimately subject to the King of Kings. That being said, I do like Princess Kate, as she was cornered by all this when she married William. I think she has tried her best and seems to be crumbling with the stress and harrassment and this brings to mind, Princess Diana. I also do like Princess Anne, as she seems grounded and certainly helped Queen Elizabeth in her illness and departure. Charles, I am not a fan of. Also, finally, to me, Camilla is NOT the Queen and she broke Diana's heart. Am I misunderstanding that Camilla should be considered "King's Consort", just as Prince Phillip was Queen Elizabeth's "Queen's Consort"?? I do not understand the concept of "royalty" whatsoever...but I am an American, after all and we have a bit of history with the British royals, don't we...?
The list needed to be longer and should have asked for least favorite. I would have voted for Prince Andrew. He is an implicated customer at Epstein's island, shopping for underage girls.
I’ve met Anne and she’s bloody hilarious, Swears like a sailor (she’s head of the Wrens) and you just know she’d get down and dirty if she went on a run ashore.
I used to be a lackadaisical royalist but no more. Lizzie presided over the destruction of my country during her reign. Charles - can't stand him. He's a WEF/globalist stooge. If I'm going to get personal - they all look inbred at this point. I voted for Anne as she's supposedly hard working and down to earth.
With the caveat that I am no royals fan, as they are just descendants of the robber barons who could hire the most mercenaries and thugs to wrest control from other robber barons and appropriate all the country's resources and wealth......with all that said, I would go for Princess Anne. She appears to be the only one of Lizzie's progeny to have shown integrity and sense of duty through her life. She does all the unglamorous public engagements and charity patron stuff with never a word of complaint or attention-seeking. The rest of them seem to be parasitic ingrates, including Charlie boy, the globalist stooge.
I think Charles never had the character for leadership. He's a spoilt brat who always whined about his duty. Lizzie knew this and hung on for as long as she could to spare the nation from her indulged, out-of-touch son. If the Brits love their First Family, let them have them. I don't get it, but I don't need to.
Have to say Anne - she's worked her butt off over the years, been done for speeding and dog biting. Showed her grit as an equestrian eating dirt in the Olympics and ditched her arranged husband for a true love. Kate's great but no more a Royal than Fergie
one meme somewhat demonstrates my opinion of royalty.
the guy with coffee at a desk outside, with the banner across the front. this variant reads:
the royals are only interesting when they're missing or dead. change my mind.
honestly, I don't even notice when they're missing, and I only notice when they die after the news is splattered all over social media.
Abstain
Once it was widely known that the Royals had no more power, why did anyone care?
To me the Royals are the predecessors to Biden. They're only there to fill a seat, while other people wield power around them. They are 100% handled.
Perhaps that's why I never cared about celebrities. It's like they are born, then handed off to a PR firm. Their mother doesn't even get to hold them first. It's all fake and synthetic -- for the sake of being fake and synthetic.
There's nothing exciting about that.
F) none of the above
I would say The King or Prince or Queen but alas, they’re all dead. So I’ll have to go with Alaskan King Crab - great legs.
Personally I have a soft spot for this chap:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Edward,_Duke_of_Kent
Lots of good things about him but most remarkably, as a result of his father dying during WW2 in an air crash, he's carried the same title for 81 years, 10 years longer than our late Queen was monarch. For the uninitiated, he is "Prince" as a result of being the grandchild of a King (George V), a right that continues to this day, although notably Princess Anne did not take it up for her 2 children.
Ooh, geeze they're all fine Subjects...
All the dead ones are wonderful
Former Emperor Akihito; dude has a day job and hasn't presided over the downfall of his country and always preferred to be left alone with his kid and was begging to retire since the 90s it seems.
We should ditch the Saxe-Coburg Gotha’s and reinstitute the Plantagenet line that tragically fell at Bosworth Field when Richard III, the true King of England was killed attempting to charge the Welsh usurper, Henry Tudor.
I am generally not a fan of "royalty" in any manner, because we are all ultimately subject to the King of Kings. That being said, I do like Princess Kate, as she was cornered by all this when she married William. I think she has tried her best and seems to be crumbling with the stress and harrassment and this brings to mind, Princess Diana. I also do like Princess Anne, as she seems grounded and certainly helped Queen Elizabeth in her illness and departure. Charles, I am not a fan of. Also, finally, to me, Camilla is NOT the Queen and she broke Diana's heart. Am I misunderstanding that Camilla should be considered "King's Consort", just as Prince Phillip was Queen Elizabeth's "Queen's Consort"?? I do not understand the concept of "royalty" whatsoever...but I am an American, after all and we have a bit of history with the British royals, don't we...?
Sorry but none of those mentioned
The list needed to be longer and should have asked for least favorite. I would have voted for Prince Andrew. He is an implicated customer at Epstein's island, shopping for underage girls.